<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dykens &#8212; 2008: A Sports-Entertainment Odyssey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prowrestlingdigest.com/2008/01/29/dykens-2008-a-sports-entertainment-odyssey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prowrestlingdigest.com/2008/01/29/dykens-2008-a-sports-entertainment-odyssey/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:48:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shiai</title>
		<link>http://www.prowrestlingdigest.com/2008/01/29/dykens-2008-a-sports-entertainment-odyssey/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prowrestlingdigest.com/?p=2181#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I think TNA&#039;s Knockout Division (best name ever!) has the potential to be one of the big across-the-board success story&#039;s in the business in &#039;08, provided the emphasis remains on bringing in talented wrestlers (many of whom are gorgeous, it must be said), rather than following the WWE&#039;s standard of hiring beauties and then training them to wrestle (and hoping some of it takes).  

And once the Kong/Kim angle is wrapped up, I&#039;m really interested to see what happens with the proposed Awesome Kong/Trenesha (aka Naomi Banks) feud.  Trenesha has the physical tools to be a credible rival for Kong, and she has the experience in Japan to put herself over in the ring.

I have some monumental problems with the way some things are done in TNA, but I have to give them their due...they&#039;ve done well by the women these last few months. Here&#039;s hoping they stay the course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think TNA&#8217;s Knockout Division (best name ever!) has the potential to be one of the big across-the-board success story&#8217;s in the business in &#8216;08, provided the emphasis remains on bringing in talented wrestlers (many of whom are gorgeous, it must be said), rather than following the WWE&#8217;s standard of hiring beauties and then training them to wrestle (and hoping some of it takes).  </p>
<p>And once the Kong/Kim angle is wrapped up, I&#8217;m really interested to see what happens with the proposed Awesome Kong/Trenesha (aka Naomi Banks) feud.  Trenesha has the physical tools to be a credible rival for Kong, and she has the experience in Japan to put herself over in the ring.</p>
<p>I have some monumental problems with the way some things are done in TNA, but I have to give them their due&#8230;they&#8217;ve done well by the women these last few months. Here&#8217;s hoping they stay the course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Chambers</title>
		<link>http://www.prowrestlingdigest.com/2008/01/29/dykens-2008-a-sports-entertainment-odyssey/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Chambers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prowrestlingdigest.com/?p=2181#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I think you are pretty much right on target, EXCEPT, for not recognizing Gail Kim, the first TNA woman&#039;s champ as the great worker she is.  She&#039;s the reason TNA HAS a Knockout&#039;s Division, and her matches with Kong were uh ..um ... er...AWESOME. ( for lack of a better word)

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are pretty much right on target, EXCEPT, for not recognizing Gail Kim, the first TNA woman&#8217;s champ as the great worker she is.  She&#8217;s the reason TNA HAS a Knockout&#8217;s Division, and her matches with Kong were uh ..um &#8230; er&#8230;AWESOME. ( for lack of a better word)</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
